3D printing aspects of fly ash and GGBS admixed binary and ternary blended cementitious mortar

dc.contributor.authorMishra, S.K.
dc.contributor.authorUpadhyay, B.
dc.contributor.authorDas, B.B.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T13:20:46Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractThis study investigates the integration of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and fly ash to sustainably reduce the usage of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in 3D printable mortar to enhance printability and engineering performance. Four mortar mixes were developed, and their printability parameters, such as flowability, extrudability, open time, yield stress, shape retention, and buildability, were assessed. Among mixes, O70G30 (70% OPC, 30% GGBS) showed the best printability, with an 18.3% and 54.3% higher shape retention factor than the control and O70F30 mixes, respectively, which can be attributed to improved particle packing and 5.5% higher yield stress. However, its open time was 22.2% lower than the control. This reduction can be attributed to the finer particle size and higher specific surface area of GGBS, which increased water demand and accelerated the loss of workability. In the hardened state, O70G30 exhibited 24% lower water absorption and 18.5% reduced permeable porosity than the control, indicating a denser microstructure. Printed specimens exhibited anisotropic strength, with the highest values observed on the YZ plane and the lowest on the ZX plane. Depending on the loading direction and mix composition, their compressive strength was 9.4–35.6% lower than that of mould-cast samples, while the flexural strength improved by 16.19% to 40.18%. Microstructural analysis revealed a denser matrix with a lower Ca/Si ratio and enhanced secondary hydration, evidenced by stronger C–S–H peaks in XRD, pronounced Si–O–Si/Al bands in FTIR, and 41.22% higher bound water (WH) with reduced portlandite (CH) in TGA compared to O70F30. These promising results can be attributed to GGBS’s role in enhancing hydration, refining the microstructure, and improving the performance of 3D printable mortar, offering a sustainable and effective pathway for digital construction. Also, the Life Cycle Impact Analysis (LCIA) revealed that the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) significantly reduces environmental impacts compared to the control mix. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2025, 29, 15, pp. 3393-3423
dc.identifier.issn19648189
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2025.2521381
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/20684
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
dc.subjectAnisotropy
dc.subjectBending strength
dc.subjectCompressive strength
dc.subjectFly ash
dc.subjectHydration
dc.subjectLife cycle
dc.subjectMortar
dc.subjectParticle size
dc.subjectParticle size analysis
dc.subjectPorosity
dc.subjectPortland cement
dc.subjectSlags
dc.subjectWater absorption
dc.subjectYield stress
dc.subject3d concrete printing
dc.subject3D-printing
dc.subjectConcrete printings
dc.subjectGround granulated blast furnace slag
dc.subjectLife cycle analysis
dc.subjectOrdinary Portland cement
dc.subjectPrintability
dc.subjectShape retention
dc.subjectStrength anisotropy
dc.subjectSustainable materials
dc.subjectMicrostructure
dc.title3D printing aspects of fly ash and GGBS admixed binary and ternary blended cementitious mortar

Files

Collections