3D printing aspects of fly ash and GGBS admixed binary and ternary blended cementitious mortar

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2025

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Taylor and Francis Ltd.

Abstract

This study investigates the integration of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and fly ash to sustainably reduce the usage of Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in 3D printable mortar to enhance printability and engineering performance. Four mortar mixes were developed, and their printability parameters, such as flowability, extrudability, open time, yield stress, shape retention, and buildability, were assessed. Among mixes, O70G30 (70% OPC, 30% GGBS) showed the best printability, with an 18.3% and 54.3% higher shape retention factor than the control and O70F30 mixes, respectively, which can be attributed to improved particle packing and 5.5% higher yield stress. However, its open time was 22.2% lower than the control. This reduction can be attributed to the finer particle size and higher specific surface area of GGBS, which increased water demand and accelerated the loss of workability. In the hardened state, O70G30 exhibited 24% lower water absorption and 18.5% reduced permeable porosity than the control, indicating a denser microstructure. Printed specimens exhibited anisotropic strength, with the highest values observed on the YZ plane and the lowest on the ZX plane. Depending on the loading direction and mix composition, their compressive strength was 9.4–35.6% lower than that of mould-cast samples, while the flexural strength improved by 16.19% to 40.18%. Microstructural analysis revealed a denser matrix with a lower Ca/Si ratio and enhanced secondary hydration, evidenced by stronger C–S–H peaks in XRD, pronounced Si–O–Si/Al bands in FTIR, and 41.22% higher bound water (WH) with reduced portlandite (CH) in TGA compared to O70F30. These promising results can be attributed to GGBS’s role in enhancing hydration, refining the microstructure, and improving the performance of 3D printable mortar, offering a sustainable and effective pathway for digital construction. Also, the Life Cycle Impact Analysis (LCIA) revealed that the incorporation of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) significantly reduces environmental impacts compared to the control mix. © 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Description

Keywords

Anisotropy, Bending strength, Compressive strength, Fly ash, Hydration, Life cycle, Mortar, Particle size, Particle size analysis, Porosity, Portland cement, Slags, Water absorption, Yield stress, 3d concrete printing, 3D-printing, Concrete printings, Ground granulated blast furnace slag, Life cycle analysis, Ordinary Portland cement, Printability, Shape retention, Strength anisotropy, Sustainable materials, Microstructure

Citation

European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 2025, 29, 15, pp. 3393-3423

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By