Estimating extreme flood magnitudes in the Upper Krishna River Basin using multiple probabilistic methods

dc.contributor.authorChoudhary, P.
dc.contributor.authorAzhoni, A.
dc.contributor.authorDevatha, C.P.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T13:20:42Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractFloods are natural phenomena with significant societal and environmental impacts. Understanding the frequency and magnitude of floods is crucial for effective water resource management, infrastructure planning, and risk mitigation. The Upper Krishna River Basin (UKRB) is prone to flooding, with major flood events occurring in the last three decades. This study was conducted in a UKRB sub-basin to analyze flood frequency. The log-normal, Gumbel Max, and Log Pearson Type III (LP3) probability distributions were used to predict future peak discharge scenarios using annual peak discharge data of 50 years (1970–2019) at Warunji, Samdoli, Arjunwad, Kurundwad, and Sadalga gauging stations. The probability distribution functions were used for estimating discharge values for return periods (T<inf>r</inf>) of 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years, 50 years, 100 years, and 200 years. The results show that the estimated discharge for return periods greater than 5 years exceeds the mean annual peak discharge (1758.94 m3/s, 1494.99 m3/s, 3674.38 m3/s, 4741.32 m3/s, and 1204.25 m3/s), and discharge greater than the 25 years return period is likely to cross the river’s carrying capacity for all five sites. This study also shows that all three probability distribution methods employed can project the river discharge satisfactorily, but the log-normal was found best fitted for Warunji and Samdoli with maximum estimated discharge of 6840 m3/s and 3481 m3/s, whereas LP3 was best fitted for Kurundwad and Sadalga sites with maximum estimated discharge of 11,973 m3/s and 3430 m3/s, while for Arjunwad, Gumbel Max was found to be the better-suited probability distribution with maximum estimated discharge of 11,128 m3/s, as indicated by the goodness-of-fit test using Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S), Anderson–Darling (A-D), and chi-square tests. The predicted peak discharge also shows a good correlation (R2 = 0.98) with the actual discharge data computed with the Weibull method. Hence, the results of the study can be used for future infrastructure planning in the study area to avoid damage due to flash floods. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, , , pp. -
dc.identifier.issn9441344
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36870-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/20647
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectEnvironmental impact
dc.subjectFlood control
dc.subjectFloods
dc.subjectProbability density function
dc.subjectRivers
dc.subjectFlood frequency analysis
dc.subjectGoodness of fit
dc.subjectGumbel
dc.subjectLog pearson type III
dc.subjectLog-normal
dc.subjectPeak discharge
dc.subjectProbability: distributions
dc.subjectReturn periods
dc.subjectRiver basins
dc.subjectUpper krishna river basin
dc.subjectDistribution functions
dc.titleEstimating extreme flood magnitudes in the Upper Krishna River Basin using multiple probabilistic methods

Files

Collections