Estimating extreme flood magnitudes in the Upper Krishna River Basin using multiple probabilistic methods
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2025
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Springer
Abstract
Floods are natural phenomena with significant societal and environmental impacts. Understanding the frequency and magnitude of floods is crucial for effective water resource management, infrastructure planning, and risk mitigation. The Upper Krishna River Basin (UKRB) is prone to flooding, with major flood events occurring in the last three decades. This study was conducted in a UKRB sub-basin to analyze flood frequency. The log-normal, Gumbel Max, and Log Pearson Type III (LP3) probability distributions were used to predict future peak discharge scenarios using annual peak discharge data of 50 years (1970–2019) at Warunji, Samdoli, Arjunwad, Kurundwad, and Sadalga gauging stations. The probability distribution functions were used for estimating discharge values for return periods (T<inf>r</inf>) of 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years, 50 years, 100 years, and 200 years. The results show that the estimated discharge for return periods greater than 5 years exceeds the mean annual peak discharge (1758.94 m3/s, 1494.99 m3/s, 3674.38 m3/s, 4741.32 m3/s, and 1204.25 m3/s), and discharge greater than the 25 years return period is likely to cross the river’s carrying capacity for all five sites. This study also shows that all three probability distribution methods employed can project the river discharge satisfactorily, but the log-normal was found best fitted for Warunji and Samdoli with maximum estimated discharge of 6840 m3/s and 3481 m3/s, whereas LP3 was best fitted for Kurundwad and Sadalga sites with maximum estimated discharge of 11,973 m3/s and 3430 m3/s, while for Arjunwad, Gumbel Max was found to be the better-suited probability distribution with maximum estimated discharge of 11,128 m3/s, as indicated by the goodness-of-fit test using Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S), Anderson–Darling (A-D), and chi-square tests. The predicted peak discharge also shows a good correlation (R2 = 0.98) with the actual discharge data computed with the Weibull method. Hence, the results of the study can be used for future infrastructure planning in the study area to avoid damage due to flash floods. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
Description
Keywords
Environmental impact, Flood control, Floods, Probability density function, Rivers, Flood frequency analysis, Goodness of fit, Gumbel, Log pearson type III, Log-normal, Peak discharge, Probability: distributions, Return periods, River basins, Upper krishna river basin, Distribution functions
Citation
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2025, , , pp. -
