Faculty Publications
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/18736
Publications by NITK Faculty
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Multihazard Assessment of the Sutlej-Beas River Basin Using Bivariate Statistical Frequency Ratio (FR) Model and Management Barriers of Land-River Interface(Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2023) Rehman, S.; Azhoni, A.Climate change coupled with increased anthropogenic activities intensifies the potency and frequency of extreme weather events. While multihazard assessments of these extreme weather events enhance the estimation of hazard susceptibility, it must be coupled with identifying institutional barriers of managing the land-river interface. Thus, this study has carried out a multihazard susceptibility assessment based on landslide and flood susceptibility in the Sutlej-Beas River basin and prepared flood and landslide susceptibility maps using eleven causative parameters through a bivariate statistical frequency ratio (FR) model. This statistical evaluation of hazard susceptibility from multiple factors is supplemented by identifying the key barriers of managing the land-river interface, producing a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges of mitigating extreme weather-related hazards in a river basin. Nearly 51% of the study area was identified as susceptible to landslide while 43% was under flood and 48% area was observed under multihazard susceptibility. Landslides, floods, and multihazard followed a similar pattern of spatial distribution where elevation, population, drainage density, stream power index (SPI), and rainfall were identified as the contributing parameters. Changing attitudes of people toward rivers, lack of coordination among different stakeholders, and deficit funds were identified as prominent barriers in the case of land-river management. Susceptibility maps generated in this study will help in identifying the areas under hazard susceptibility while the identified institutional barriers may guide towards contextual sustainable planning of the basin and attainment of sustainable development goals. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.Item Estimating extreme flood magnitudes in the Upper Krishna River Basin using multiple probabilistic methods(Springer, 2025) Choudhary, P.; Azhoni, A.; Devatha, C.P.Floods are natural phenomena with significant societal and environmental impacts. Understanding the frequency and magnitude of floods is crucial for effective water resource management, infrastructure planning, and risk mitigation. The Upper Krishna River Basin (UKRB) is prone to flooding, with major flood events occurring in the last three decades. This study was conducted in a UKRB sub-basin to analyze flood frequency. The log-normal, Gumbel Max, and Log Pearson Type III (LP3) probability distributions were used to predict future peak discharge scenarios using annual peak discharge data of 50 years (1970–2019) at Warunji, Samdoli, Arjunwad, Kurundwad, and Sadalga gauging stations. The probability distribution functions were used for estimating discharge values for return periods (Tr) of 2 years, 5 years, 10 years, 25 years, 50 years, 100 years, and 200 years. The results show that the estimated discharge for return periods greater than 5 years exceeds the mean annual peak discharge (1758.94 m3/s, 1494.99 m3/s, 3674.38 m3/s, 4741.32 m3/s, and 1204.25 m3/s), and discharge greater than the 25 years return period is likely to cross the river’s carrying capacity for all five sites. This study also shows that all three probability distribution methods employed can project the river discharge satisfactorily, but the log-normal was found best fitted for Warunji and Samdoli with maximum estimated discharge of 6840 m3/s and 3481 m3/s, whereas LP3 was best fitted for Kurundwad and Sadalga sites with maximum estimated discharge of 11,973 m3/s and 3430 m3/s, while for Arjunwad, Gumbel Max was found to be the better-suited probability distribution with maximum estimated discharge of 11,128 m3/s, as indicated by the goodness-of-fit test using Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K-S), Anderson–Darling (A-D), and chi-square tests. The predicted peak discharge also shows a good correlation (R2 = 0.98) with the actual discharge data computed with the Weibull method. Hence, the results of the study can be used for future infrastructure planning in the study area to avoid damage due to flash floods. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.