Conference Papers

Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/28506

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Item
    On the effectiveness of CoDel for active queue management
    (2013) Raghuvanshi, D.M.; Annappa, B.; Tahiliani, M.P.
    Internet in the present scenario has become a gigantic source of information. There has been a tremendous rise in the variety of Internet applications, with each application demanding a specific performance criteria to be satisfied. Routers presently use Passive Queue Management (PQM) mechanisms and hence, merely have any control over the queue occupancy. Therefore, there has been an increased interest in exploring Active Queue Management (AQM) in Internet routers so as to reduce the queue latency and meet the demands of time sensitive applications. In this paper, we mainly focus on analyzing the effectiveness of a recently proposed AQM mechanism called Controlled Delay (CoDel). We study the effectiveness of CoDel by carrying out simulations in ns-2 and comparing its performance with existing AQM mechanisms in variety of Internet scenarios. Based on the simulation results obtained, we discuss the advantages and shortcomings of CoDel in terms of bottleneck link utilization, mean queue length and packet drop rate. © 2013 IEEE.
  • Item
    Performance evaluation of CoDel for active queue management in wired-cum-wireless networks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2014) Jain, T.; Annappa, B.; Tahiliani, M.P.
    Internet is the major source of information today and its usage is increasing at an alarming rate. A wide variety of data travels over the Internet to cater the needs of end users. This has eventually led to heavy congestion in the network which in turn, worsens the user perceived latency. Internet routers are the main agents that detect congestion prior to end hosts. Traditional router incorporates Passive Queue Management (PQM) strategies which fail to control congestion. Moreover, PQM has several drawbacks which drew the attention of researchers towards the evolution of Active Queue Management (AQM). AQMs are designed to effectively avoid congestion at network routers. AQM apparently became very popular for wired networks, but there are very few researches to find their effectiveness over wireless networks. In this paper we evaluate the effectiveness of a recently proposed AQM mechanism called Controlled Delay (CoDel) in wired-cum-wireless networks. Simulations are carried out by using ns-2 and CoDel's performance is compared with that of Random Early Detection (RED) and Droptail. © 2014 IEEE.
  • Item
    Extended ECN mechanism to mitigate ECN-based attacks
    (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2014) Bommisetti, S.; Annappa, B.; Tahiliani, M.P.
    Today, usage of internet is growing exponentially. Congestion detection and avoidance algorithms are the major issues in TCP/IP. Earlier, packet drops are only source of congestion indication, but it leads to loss of throughput. Active Queue Management (AQM) can detect congestion before the queue overflows and informs the end hosts to respond congestion. It allows gateways to drop packets when average queue is greater than maximum threshold and marks the packets otherwise. Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) mechanism marks the packets when the average queue size is between predefined thresholds and improves the throughput of a network. But it depends on the end hosts to respond to congestion. So there is a possibility of misbehavior by sender to increase its congestion window, even if the receiver correctly signals about congestion. So misbehaving ECN sender flow obtains more throughput than the normal ECN-enabled flows. We present an Extended ECN mechanism that enables a router to mark packets and the receiver to signal congestion to the sender without trusting the sender whether it has responded congestion or not. Our improved mechanism is robust in detection and prevention of this misbehaving sender in network and compatible with ECN and TCP/IP mechanisms. © 2014 IEEE.