Prakash, G.B.Prashanth, M.H.Narasimhan, M.C.Mahendra, K.Das, A.K.2026-02-042024Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2024, 133, , pp. -1678442https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104630https://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/20887Owing to their much-reduced carbon footprint and lower embodied energy, compared to conventional Portland Cement (OPC-based) Concrete mixes, Alkali Activated Concrete (AAC) mixes represent a pivotal advancement towards achieving sustainability goals. The fracture properties were investigated using Three-Point Bending Tests (3-PBT) under the mode I failure mechanism. This study utilises Taguchi analysis to analyse and optimise Self-Compacting Alkali-Activated Concrete (SAAC), focusing mainly on its flexural strength and fracture characteristics. An L-16 orthogonal array of experiments with three input parameters − replacement of Blast Furnace Slag (BFS) with Fly ash (FA) (0 %, 30 %, 40 %, and 50 %), Steel Fibers (SF) volume content (0 %, 0.25 %, 0.5 % and 0.75 %) and Notch to Depth (a<inf>0</inf>/d) ratio (0.2,0.3,0.4 and 0.5), at four levels each, was adopted. The Work of Fracture Method (WFM) and Double K Fracture Criterion (DKFC) were utilised to determine the Fracture Energy (G<inf>F</inf>) and fracture toughness, respectively. The results obtained from all the sixteen mixes showed that the F0-S0.75-N0.5 mix demonstrated better values in several parameters, such as flexural strength of 7.82 MPa,K<inf>IC</inf>ini of 0.928 MPa√m, K<inf>IC</inf>uns of 6.99 MPa√m and K<inf>IC</inf>ini/ K<inf>IC</inf>uns of 0.133. A maximum G<inf>F</inf> of 2350 N/m was obtained with F50-S0.75-N0.2 mix. However, all the inferior values of these parameters were observed with F50-S0-N0.5 mix, which recorded a flexural strength of 4.90 MPa, K<inf>IC</inf>ini of 0.612 MPa√m,K<inf>IC</inf>uns of 1.16 MPa√m, K<inf>IC</inf>ini/ K<inf>IC</inf>uns of 0.528 and G<inf>F</inf> of 125 N/m. Through Taguchi analysis, the optimal combination for flexural strength was identified as FA 0 %, SF 0.75 %, and a<inf>0</inf>/d 0.5 and for both Initial Fracture Toughness (K<inf>IC</inf>ini) and Unstable Fracture Toughness (K<inf>IC</inf>uns) at FA 0 %, SF 0.75 % and a<inf>0</inf>/d 0.4. For both the ratio of initial to unstable fracture toughness (K<inf>IC</inf>ini/ K<inf>IC</inf>uns) and fracture energy (G<inf>F</inf>), the optimum combination was FA 0 %, SF 0.75 % and a<inf>0</inf>/d 0.2. Furthermore, the results indicate that FA significantly influences K<inf>IC</inf>ini, while SF predominantly affects all other parameters. The predictive performance of the regression equations demonstrates good agreement with experimental outcomes. © 2024 Elsevier LtdBending strengthBending testsCarbon footprintCompression testingConcrete mixturesFiber reinforced concreteFracture energyFracture toughnessMortarPortland cementSelf compacting concreteStrain rateAlkali-activated concretesEnergyFiber reinforced self-compacting alkali-activated concreteFibre-reinforcedFracture propertyK ICOptimisationsSelf-compactingTaguchi analysisUnstable fractureBlast furnaces