Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://idr.nitk.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/10732
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPhadatare, M.K.
dc.contributor.authorVerma, S.K.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-31T08:22:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-03-31T08:22:58Z-
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationDesalination and Water Treatment, 2009, Vol.2, 43891, pp.254-259en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://idr.nitk.ac.in/jspui/handle/123456789/10732-
dc.description.abstractThe intention of this work was to study the effect of cover materials on heat and mass transfer coefficient and hence productivity of the still. Two plastic stills having similar geometrical features were constructed to maintain the comparison under the same weather conditions. The condensing surface of one still was an acrylic (plastic) cover (3 mm thick) while of the other still it was a glass cover (3 mm thick), both fixed in an aluminum frame. It was found that for water depth of 10 cm the plastic solar still with the glass cover produced 30-35% more output than the plastic solar still with Plexiglas cover. The evaporative heat transfer coefficient for the glass cover still was 57% more than that for the still with the plastic cover which resulted in a higher output. Plastic can be used as the structural material for solar stills but increased costs do not always increase the distillate output, 2009 Desalination Publications.en_US
dc.titleEffect of cover materials on heat and mass transfer coefficients in a plastic solar stillen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:1. Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.