Groundwater level modeling using Augmented Artificial Ecosystem Optimization

dc.contributor.authorNguyen, N.
dc.contributor.authorDeb Barma, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorvan Lam, T.
dc.contributor.authorKisi, O.
dc.contributor.authorMahesha, A.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-04T12:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description.abstractNature-inspired optimization is an active area of research in the artificial intelligence (AI) field and has recently been adopted in hydrology for the calibration (training) of both process-based and statistical models. This study proposes an improved AI model, Augmented Artificial Ecosystem Optimization-based Multi-Layer Perceptron (AAEO-MLP), to build a monthly groundwater level (GWL) forecasting model. AAEO-MLP model is built on the novel Augmented version of Artificial Ecosystem Optimization and traditional MLP network. In AAEO, Levy-flight trajectory and Gaussian random are utilized in exploration and exploitation to improve the optimizing ability. The AAEO-MLP model is tested on two time-series (1989–2012) datasets collected at two wells in India. Various explanatory variables such as monthly cumulative precipitation, mean temperature, tidal height, and previous measurements of GWL were considered for predicting 1-month ahead of GWL. The performance of AAEO-MLP was benchmarked against 17 different models (original AEO, 3 different variants of AEO, and 13 well-known models) in terms of forecasting accuracy based on six metrics (e.g., mean absolute error, root mean square error, Kling–Gupta efficiency, normalized Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, Pearson's correlation index, a20 index). Furthermore, convergence analysis and model stability are employed to indicate the effectiveness of AAEO-MLP. The compared results express that the AAEO-MLP is superior to other models in terms of prediction accuracy, convergence, and stability. Overall, the results depict that the AAEO is a promising approach for optimizing machine learning models (e.g., MLP) and should be explored for other hydrological forecasting applications (e.g., streamflow, rainfall) to further assess its strengths over existing methods. © 2022 Elsevier B.V.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Hydrology, 2023, 617, , pp. -
dc.identifier.issn221694
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.129034
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/22044
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.subjectAquifers
dc.subjectCorrelation methods
dc.subjectEcosystems
dc.subjectEfficiency
dc.subjectForecasting
dc.subjectGroundwater resources
dc.subjectHeuristic algorithms
dc.subjectHydrogeology
dc.subjectMean square error
dc.subjectNeural networks
dc.subjectArtificial ecosystems
dc.subjectAugmented artificial ecosystem optimization
dc.subjectCoastal aquifers
dc.subjectGround water level
dc.subjectGroundwater level modeling
dc.subjectLevel model
dc.subjectMeta-heuristics algorithms
dc.subjectNature inspired computing
dc.subjectNeural-networks
dc.subjectOptimisations
dc.subjectOptimization
dc.subjectalgorithm
dc.subjectartificial intelligence
dc.subjectartificial neural network
dc.subjectcalibration
dc.subjectcoastal aquifer
dc.subjectcorrelation
dc.subjectgroundwater
dc.subjecthydrological modeling
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectoptimization
dc.subjectprediction
dc.subjecttrajectory
dc.subjectwater level
dc.subjectIndia
dc.titleGroundwater level modeling using Augmented Artificial Ecosystem Optimization

Files

Collections