Performance analysis of stack decoding on block coded modulation schemes using tree diagram

No Thumbnail Available

Date

2012

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

The channel encoder adds redundancy in a structured way to provide error control capability. Modulator converts the symbol sequences from the channel encoder into waveforms which are then transmitted over the channel. Usually channel coder and modulator are implemented independently one after the other. But in a band limited channel better coding gains without sacrificing signal power are achieved when coding is combined with modulation. Block Coded Modulation (BCM) is such a scheme that results from the combination of linear block codes and modulation. In this paper we are proposing a stack decoding of rate 2/3 and rate 1/2 BCM schemes using tree structure and performance is compared with the Viterbi decoding that uses trellis representation. Simulation result shows that at reasonable bit error rate stack decoder performance is just 0.2 to 0.5 dB inferior to that of Viterbi decoding. Since stack decoding is a near optimum decoding scheme and whose decoding procedure is adaptable to noise level, we can consider this method in place of Viterbi decoding which is optimum and its decoding complexity grows exponentially with large code lengths. © K.H. Prashantha, U.K. Vineeth, U. Sripati, Sh.K. Rajesh, 2012.

Description

Keywords

Band-limited channels, Block coded modulation, Channel encoder, Code length, Coding gains, Decoder performance, Decoding complexity, Decoding scheme, Error control, Linear block code, Near optimum, Noise levels, Performance analysis, Signal power, Symbol sequences, Tree diagram, Tree structures, Viterbi decoding, Wave forms, Forestry, Turbo codes, Viterbi algorithm, Decoding, Algorithms, Coding

Citation

Radioelectronics and Communications Systems, 2012, 55, 8, pp. 349-359

Collections

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By