Solar active ZnO–Eu2O3 for energy and environmental applications

dc.contributor.authorSubramanian, S.
dc.contributor.authorKumaravel, K.
dc.contributor.authorK, K.
dc.contributor.authorBhat, D.K.
dc.contributor.authorIyer Sathiyanarayanan, K.
dc.contributor.authorSwaminathan, M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-05T09:27:49Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> nanocomposite was fabricated by a simple hydrothermal route. This material forms a potential class of photocatalysts in which the increased absorption behaviour in ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> is expected to couple with the existing characteristics of Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> and ZnO materials. ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> was characterized using surface analytical (SEM, EDS, HR-TEM, AFM, XRD) and spectroscopic techniques (XPS, DRS,PL). From the XRD patterns, formation of well-crystallized cubic Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> and hexagonal wurtzite phase of ZnO were inferred. Presence of nanoflake like structure with hexagonal ZnO and cubical Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> is shown by SEM pictures. ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> possesses higher UV and visible absorption than Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> and ZnO. ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> produces larger methanol oxidation current indicating its anodic catalytic efficiency in direct methanol fuel cells (DMFCs). This reveals higher electrocatalytic activity of ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> than ZnO. It is observed that at ?1.6 V, cathodic current density (i<inf>pc</inf>) of ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> (?103.17 mA cm?2) for Hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is more than five times of ZnO (?18.19 mA cm?2) and the hydrogen evolved with ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>is 15.6 mL, which is higher than that of ZnO (6.8 mL). This indicates the superior catalytic property of ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> in water splitting. This catalyst exhibited higher catalytic activity of 99.2% in the photodegradation of Rhodamine B (Rh-B) with natural sunlight in 75 min under neutral pH, whereas Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> and ZnO produced 60 and 82% degradations in the same time. Degradation quantum efficiency by ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> is larger than ZnO and Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf>. ZnO–Eu<inf>2</inf>O<inf>3</inf> was stable and reusable. The multifunctionality of this catalyst makes it suitable for energy and environmental applications. © 2020 Elsevier B.V.
dc.identifier.citationMaterials Chemistry and Physics, 2020, 256, , pp. -
dc.identifier.issn2540584
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123624
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/23567
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.subjectAnodic oxidation
dc.subjectCatalyst activity
dc.subjectCatalytic oxidation
dc.subjectDirect methanol fuel cells (DMFC)
dc.subjectHydrogen
dc.subjectII-VI semiconductors
dc.subjectMethanol
dc.subjectMethanol fuels
dc.subjectOxide minerals
dc.subjectRhodamine B
dc.subjectRhodium compounds
dc.subjectSolar energy
dc.subjectX ray diffraction
dc.subjectZinc sulfide
dc.subjectCatalytic efficiencies
dc.subjectCatalytic properties
dc.subjectCathodic current density
dc.subjectDirect methanol fuel cells (DMFCs)
dc.subjectElectrocatalytic activity
dc.subjectEnvironmental applications
dc.subjectMethanol oxidation currents
dc.subjectSpectroscopic technique
dc.subjectZinc oxide
dc.titleSolar active ZnO–Eu2O3 for energy and environmental applications

Files

Collections