Evaluation of satellite precipitation products in simulating streamflow in a humid tropical catchment of india using a semi-distributed hydrological model

dc.contributor.authorSharannya, T.M.
dc.contributor.authorAl-Ansari, N.
dc.contributor.authorDeb Barma, S.
dc.contributor.authorMahesha, M.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-05T09:28:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractPrecipitation obtained from rain gauges is an essential input for hydrological modelling. It is often sparse in highly topographically varying terrain, exhibiting a certain amount of uncertainty in hydrological modelling. Hence, satellite rainfall estimates have been used as an alternative or as a supplement to station observations. In this study, an attempt was made to evaluate the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and Climate Hazards Group InfraRed Precipitation with Station data (CHIRPS), employing a semi-distributed hydrological model, i.e., Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), for simulating streamflow and validating them against the flows generated by the India Meteorological Department (IMD) rainfall dataset in the Gurupura river catchment of India. Distinct testing scenarios for simulating streamflow were made to check the suitability of these satellite precipitation data. The TRMM was able to better estimate rainfall than CHIRPS after performing categorical and continuous statistical results with respect to IMD rainfall data. While comparing the performance of model simulations, the IMD rainfall-driven streamflow emerged as the best followed by the TRMM, CHIRPS-0.05, and CHIRPS-0.25. The coefficient of determination (R2), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), and percent bias (PBIAS) were in the range 0.63 to 0.86, 0.62 to 0.86, and ?14.98 to 0.87, respectively. Further, an attempt was made to examine the spatial distribution of key hydrological signature, i.e., flow duration curve (FDC) in the 30–95 percentile range of non-exceedance probability. It was observed that TRMM underestimated the flow for agricultural water availability corresponding to 30 percent, even though it showed a good performance compared to the other satellite rainfall-driven model outputs. © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
dc.identifier.citationWater (Switzerland), 2020, 12, 9, pp. -
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w12092400
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/23729
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.subjectAgricultural robots
dc.subjectCatchments
dc.subjectChirp modulation
dc.subjectClimate models
dc.subjectProbability distributions
dc.subjectRain
dc.subjectRunoff
dc.subjectSatellites
dc.subjectStream flow
dc.subjectTropics
dc.subjectUncertainty analysis
dc.subjectCoefficient of determination
dc.subjectExceedance probability
dc.subjectHydrological modelling
dc.subjectSatellite precipitation
dc.subjectSatellite precipitation products
dc.subjectSemi distributed hydrological models
dc.subjectSoil and water assessment tool
dc.subjectTropical rainfall measuring missions
dc.subjectRain gages
dc.subjectcatchment
dc.subjecthydrological modeling
dc.subjectprecipitation assessment
dc.subjectraingauge
dc.subjectsatellite
dc.subjectstreamflow
dc.subjecttropical region
dc.subjectIndia
dc.titleEvaluation of satellite precipitation products in simulating streamflow in a humid tropical catchment of india using a semi-distributed hydrological model

Files

Collections