Exploring different approaches for landslide susceptibility zonation mapping in Manipur: a comparative study of AHP, FR, machine learning, and deep learning models

dc.contributor.authorKshetrimayum, A.
dc.contributor.authorRamesh, H.
dc.contributor.authorGoyal, A.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-04T12:25:29Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe movement of rock, soil, and other debris down a slope or incline is a geological phenomenon known as a landslide. To analyze the landslide susceptibility (LS) in Manipur, the study develops and compares six heterogeneous models, specifically the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Frequency Ratio (FR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Deep Learning (DL) models were considered. The study found that the DL is the most intriguing model, with a total accuracy of 97.2%, followed by the RF, KNN, SVM, AHP, and FR, with respective accuracy levels of 94.5%, 93.1%, 92.6%, 85.5%, and 76.9%. © 2024 Mapping Sciences Institute, Australia and Geospatial Council of Australia.
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Spatial Science, 2024, , , pp. -
dc.identifier.issn14498596
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2024.2368156
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/21398
dc.publisherMapping Sciences Institute Australia
dc.subjectAnalytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)
dc.subjectdeep learning
dc.subjectFrequency Ratio (FR)
dc.subjectLandslide susceptibility mapping
dc.subjectmachine learning
dc.subjectmodels comparison
dc.titleExploring different approaches for landslide susceptibility zonation mapping in Manipur: a comparative study of AHP, FR, machine learning, and deep learning models

Files

Collections