Exploring different approaches for landslide susceptibility zonation mapping in Manipur: a comparative study of AHP, FR, machine learning, and deep learning models
| dc.contributor.author | Kshetrimayum, A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ramesh, H. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Goyal, A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-04T12:25:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The movement of rock, soil, and other debris down a slope or incline is a geological phenomenon known as a landslide. To analyze the landslide susceptibility (LS) in Manipur, the study develops and compares six heterogeneous models, specifically the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), Frequency Ratio (FR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Deep Learning (DL) models were considered. The study found that the DL is the most intriguing model, with a total accuracy of 97.2%, followed by the RF, KNN, SVM, AHP, and FR, with respective accuracy levels of 94.5%, 93.1%, 92.6%, 85.5%, and 76.9%. © 2024 Mapping Sciences Institute, Australia and Geospatial Council of Australia. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Spatial Science, 2024, , , pp. - | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 14498596 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2024.2368156 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/21398 | |
| dc.publisher | Mapping Sciences Institute Australia | |
| dc.subject | Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) | |
| dc.subject | deep learning | |
| dc.subject | Frequency Ratio (FR) | |
| dc.subject | Landslide susceptibility mapping | |
| dc.subject | machine learning | |
| dc.subject | models comparison | |
| dc.title | Exploring different approaches for landslide susceptibility zonation mapping in Manipur: a comparative study of AHP, FR, machine learning, and deep learning models |
