Mitigation of secondary flows and pressure side bubble in turbine blade passage using asymmetric endwall contouring: a steady-state analysis

dc.contributor.authorBabu, S.
dc.contributor.authorJannet, S.
dc.contributor.authorRaja, R.
dc.contributor.authorLionel, P.
dc.contributor.authorOommen, L.P.
dc.contributor.authorSurendran, A.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-03T13:04:17Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.description.abstractIn turbine passages, secondary vortices and pressure-side bubbles significantly contribute to aerodynamic losses and reduced blade efficiency issues that are critical in industrial gas turbine performance. Hence, it is very important to mitigate such losses to enhance overall turbine efficiency. Several research attempts have already been made to address this challenge; however, most studies have not focused explicitly on pressure-side bubble mitigation strategies. In the present investigation, an effort has been made to investigate the impact of endwall contouring in minimizing losses caused by secondary vortices, particularly focusing on pressure-side bubble formation. Experimental and numerical investigations are conducted on a low-speed blowing-type turbine cascade wind tunnel. The experimental study involves in-cascade testing, while numerical simulations are performed using ANSYS Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with the Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. Three contouring configurations (EC 1, EC 2, and EC 3) are compared against a non-profiled base case (BC). The results confirm that endwall curvature significantly alters secondary flow behavior and static pressure distribution. While EC 1 and EC 2 generated stagnant zones in the valleys, causing additional losses while the EC 3 profile with optimized hump height and valley depth, redistributed pressure effectively. This effectively suppressed lateral flow migration and pressure-side bubble formation, which in turn enhanced overall turbine performance. In comparison to the base case, the EC 3 design quantitatively reduced total pressure loss by 3.43%, proving its efficacy in improving aerodynamic performance. © 2025 IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
dc.identifier.citationEngineering Research Express, 2025, 7, 4, pp. -
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ae223b
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/19887
dc.publisherInstitute of Physics
dc.subjectAerodynamics
dc.subjectBubbles (in fluids)
dc.subjectComputational fluid dynamics
dc.subjectGas turbines
dc.subjectNavier Stokes equations
dc.subjectSecondary flow
dc.subjectShear flow
dc.subjectTurbine components
dc.subjectVortex flow
dc.subjectWind tunnels
dc.subjectContouring
dc.subjectEnd-wall
dc.subjectEndwall contouring
dc.subjectPressure side
dc.subjectPressure side bubble
dc.subjectSecondary vortex
dc.subjectStreamwise vorticity
dc.subjectTurbine blade
dc.subjectYaw angle deviation
dc.subjectYaw angles
dc.subjectTurbomachine blades
dc.titleMitigation of secondary flows and pressure side bubble in turbine blade passage using asymmetric endwall contouring: a steady-state analysis

Files

Collections