Mitigation of secondary flows and pressure side bubble in turbine blade passage using asymmetric endwall contouring: a steady-state analysis
| dc.contributor.author | Babu, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Jannet, S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Raja, R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Lionel, P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Oommen, L.P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Surendran, A. | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-02-03T13:04:17Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In turbine passages, secondary vortices and pressure-side bubbles significantly contribute to aerodynamic losses and reduced blade efficiency issues that are critical in industrial gas turbine performance. Hence, it is very important to mitigate such losses to enhance overall turbine efficiency. Several research attempts have already been made to address this challenge; however, most studies have not focused explicitly on pressure-side bubble mitigation strategies. In the present investigation, an effort has been made to investigate the impact of endwall contouring in minimizing losses caused by secondary vortices, particularly focusing on pressure-side bubble formation. Experimental and numerical investigations are conducted on a low-speed blowing-type turbine cascade wind tunnel. The experimental study involves in-cascade testing, while numerical simulations are performed using ANSYS Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations with the Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. Three contouring configurations (EC 1, EC 2, and EC 3) are compared against a non-profiled base case (BC). The results confirm that endwall curvature significantly alters secondary flow behavior and static pressure distribution. While EC 1 and EC 2 generated stagnant zones in the valleys, causing additional losses while the EC 3 profile with optimized hump height and valley depth, redistributed pressure effectively. This effectively suppressed lateral flow migration and pressure-side bubble formation, which in turn enhanced overall turbine performance. In comparison to the base case, the EC 3 design quantitatively reduced total pressure loss by 3.43%, proving its efficacy in improving aerodynamic performance. © 2025 IOP Publishing Ltd. All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved. | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Engineering Research Express, 2025, 7, 4, pp. - | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/ae223b | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/19887 | |
| dc.publisher | Institute of Physics | |
| dc.subject | Aerodynamics | |
| dc.subject | Bubbles (in fluids) | |
| dc.subject | Computational fluid dynamics | |
| dc.subject | Gas turbines | |
| dc.subject | Navier Stokes equations | |
| dc.subject | Secondary flow | |
| dc.subject | Shear flow | |
| dc.subject | Turbine components | |
| dc.subject | Vortex flow | |
| dc.subject | Wind tunnels | |
| dc.subject | Contouring | |
| dc.subject | End-wall | |
| dc.subject | Endwall contouring | |
| dc.subject | Pressure side | |
| dc.subject | Pressure side bubble | |
| dc.subject | Secondary vortex | |
| dc.subject | Streamwise vorticity | |
| dc.subject | Turbine blade | |
| dc.subject | Yaw angle deviation | |
| dc.subject | Yaw angles | |
| dc.subject | Turbomachine blades | |
| dc.title | Mitigation of secondary flows and pressure side bubble in turbine blade passage using asymmetric endwall contouring: a steady-state analysis |
