Optimum Waveform Selection for Target State Estimation in the Joint Radar-Communication System

dc.contributor.authorMahipathi, A.C.
dc.contributor.authorPardhasaradhi, B.P.
dc.contributor.authorGunnery, S.
dc.contributor.authorSrihari, P.
dc.contributor.authorD'Souza, J.
dc.contributor.authorJena, P.
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-04T12:25:32Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractThe widespread usage of the Radio Frequency (RF) spectrum for wireless and mobile communication systems generated a significant spectrum scarcity. The Joint Radar-Communication System (JRCS) provides a framework to simultaneously utilize the allocated radar spectrum for sensing and communication purposes. Generally, a Successive Interference Cancellation (SIC) based receiver is applied to mitigate mutual interference in the JRCS configuration. However, this SIC receiver model introduces a communication residual component. In response to this issue, the article presents a novel measurement model based on communication residual components for various radar waveforms. The radar system's performance within the JRCS framework is then evaluated using the Fisher Information Matrix (FIM). The radar waveforms considered in this investigation are rectangular pulse, triangular pulse, Gaussian pulse, Linear Frequency Modulated (LFM) pulse, LFM-Gaussian pulse, and Non-Linear Frequency Modulated (NLFM) pulse. After that, the Kalman filter is deployed to estimate the target kinematics (range and range rate) of a single linearly moving target for different waveforms. Additionally, range and range rate estimation errors are quantified using the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) metric. Furthermore, the Posterior Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (PCRLB) is derived to validate the estimation accuracy of various waveforms. The simulation results show that the range and range rate estimation errors are within the PCRLB limit at all time instants for all the designated waveforms. The results further reveal that the NLFM pulse waveform provides improved range and range rate error performance compared to all other waveforms. © 2020 IEEE.
dc.identifier.citationIEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing, 2024, 5, , pp. 459-477
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1109/OJSP.2024.3359997
dc.identifier.urihttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/21454
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
dc.subjectChirp modulation
dc.subjectClutter (information theory)
dc.subjectCovariance matrix
dc.subjectCramer-Rao bounds
dc.subjectErrors
dc.subjectFisher information matrix
dc.subjectFrequency estimation
dc.subjectFrequency modulation
dc.subjectMean square error
dc.subjectMobile telecommunication systems
dc.subjectRadar measurement
dc.subjectRadar tracking
dc.subjectRadio broadcasting
dc.subjectState estimation
dc.subjectTracking radar
dc.subjectCommunications systems
dc.subjectCrame-Rao lower bounds
dc.subjectCramer Rao lower bound
dc.subjectFisher information matrices
dc.subjectJoint radar-communication system
dc.subjectMeasurement Noise
dc.subjectMeasurement noise covariance
dc.subjectNoise covariance
dc.subjectPosterior crame-rao low bound
dc.subjectRadar communication
dc.subjectReceiver
dc.subjectRoot mean square errors
dc.subjectTargets tracking
dc.subjectTarget tracking
dc.titleOptimum Waveform Selection for Target State Estimation in the Joint Radar-Communication System

Files

Collections