Faculty Publications

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/18736

Publications by NITK Faculty

Browse

Subject: search.filters.subject.Comparative assessment

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Acid, alkali, and chloride resistance of concrete composed of low-carbonated fly ash
    (American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) onlinejls@asce.org, 2017) Sahoo, S.; Das, B.B.; Mohammed Mustakim, S.
    This research investigates the effect of carbonated fly ash inclusion in concrete as partial replacement of cement on the durability performance when exposed to salt, sulfate, and acid solution. The effect of chemical exposure periods (30, 60, 90, and 120 days) on compressive strength and weight of concrete with low volume (25%) replacement of cement was investigated for various water curing ages (28, 56, 90, and 180 days). A comparative assessment with low volume (25% cement replacement) fly ash concrete and control concrete was also conducted. It was observed from the results that low volume carbonated fly ash concrete demonstrated a significant increase in resistance to loss in compressive strength and weight against salt, sulfate, and acid attack. Gray relation-based analysis was performed to determine suitable parameters for simultaneous minimization of strength loss and weight loss under chemical exposure. It can be recommended that, due to its cost-effectiveness, easy processing, and environmental friendly nature, carbonated fly ash can be adopted in construction as a partial replacement of cement in concrete. © 2016 American Society of Civil Engineers.
  • No Thumbnail Available
    Item
    Investigating the wave attenuation capabilities of rectangular pile head breakwater: A physical modelling approach
    (Elsevier Ltd, 2024) Hunasanahally Sathyanarayana, A.H.; Suvarna, P.S.; Banagani, V.K.Y.; Umesh, P.; Shirlal, K.G.
    The study provides a comprehensive examination of single row Rectangular Pile Head Breakwaters (RPHB), encompassing both non-perforated and perforated variations. In the non-perforated RPHB category, the investigation delves into the effects of pile head height and width, and wave climate. For perforated RPHB structures, the study analyses the influence of percentage of perforations, perforation size, and depth of water. Further, the research includes a comparative assessment between non-perforated and perforated RPHB structures. Additionally, the research conducts a comparative analysis with similar structures. In the case of non-perforated RPHB, the configuration with relative pile head diameter (D/d) of 2.4 and relative pile head height (Y/Hmax) of 1.5 stood out as the most effective model. Similarly, the perforated RPHB demonstrated its maximum wave attenuation potential with percentage of perforations (P) of 24% with relative size of perforations (S/D) of 0.25. This optimal configuration achieved a minimal wave transmission coefficient (Kt) of 0.53, reflection coefficient (Kr) of 0.33, and energy dissipation coefficient (Kd) of 0.79 at a relative water depth (h/H) 0.865. Notably, the introduction of perforations on the RPHB structure led to an improvement in wave attenuation performance by 4–8%, resulting in lower reflection and higher energy dissipation. Comparatively, the RPHB structure outperformed the Enlarged (cylindrical) Pile Head Breakwater (EPHB) and Conical Pile Head Breakwater (CPHB) structures in terms of wave attenuation, exhibiting higher reflection and superior energy dissipation characteristics. The consistent outcome of these investigations reveals that the RPHB exhibits superior hydrodynamic performance characteristics and design suitability, making it a promising choice for breakwater applications. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd