Faculty Publications

Permanent URI for this communityhttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/18736

Publications by NITK Faculty

Browse

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Item
    A Comparative Analysis of Forest Fire Risk Zone Mapping Methods with Expert Knowledge
    (Springer, 2019) Yathish, H.; Athira, K.V.; Konkathi, K.; Umesh, U.; Shetty, A.
    Despite repeated occurrences of forest fire, very less scientific studies have been reported in the Indian context especially in Kudremukh region to mitigate and suppress the fire. The objective of this article was to pool the expert knowledge on forest fire triggering factors from officials working in wildlife division in the Western Ghats of India through a questionnaire and to validate the risk zones obtained from three popular fire risk zone mapping methods namely logistic regression, multi-criteria decision analysis, and weighted overlay. Based on the earlier studies and expert knowledge, fire ignition parameters considered are elevation, slope, and aspect, proximity to roads, water bodies and area of human activities, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), land surface temperature (LST), and vegetation type. The regression model was based on previous fire occurrences and the other two based on expert’s opinion. The three models were validated and compared using past fire occurrence events. The logistic regression model gave 88.89% of accuracy and that of multi-criteria decision analysis with 74.6% accuracy, and that of weighted overlay method with an accuracy of 68.24% for the specific study area. The logistic regression model is useful in the presence of historical data, whereas expert knowledge is helpful for mapping risk zones using multi-criteria decision analysis and weighted overlay analysis when historical data are scarce or not available for mapping risk zones. The obtained risk maps can be used for deciding watchtower locations, installation of sensors, cameras, etc. In every forest division, it is recommended to prepare a standard questionnaire form and document their experiences on forest fire in the region under their supervision before they are getting transferred to another location. © 2019, Indian Society of Remote Sensing.
  • Item
    Inter comparison of post-fire burn severity indices of Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 imagery using Google Earth Engine
    (Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2021) Konkathi, P.; Shetty, A.
    Forest fires are significant catastrophic events that affect the landscape and vegetation in forested lands. They cause loss of biodiversity, land degradation & ecological imbalance. As the forest fires cause extreme damage to the habitat, it is of utmost necessity to assess the impact of fire on canopy/vegetation. Post-fire assessment is an essential element for finding the effects of fire on vegetation and implementing mitigation strategies. In this article, a Post-fire burn severity assessment was carried out with high-resolution multi-spectral images such as Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 employing Google Earth Engine (GEE) to locate the burnt areas and fire severity. Three commonly used fire severity indices based on pre-fire Normalized Burn Ratio (NBR) and post-fire NBR, namely differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR), Relativized Burn Ratio (RBR), and Relativized dNBR (RdNBR) are computed and compared based on their accuracy with the active fire points provided by MODIS & VIIRS. Both Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 exhibited a similar trend in mapping burn severity. The RdNBR resulted in high accuracy over heterogeneous landscapes with 61.52% for Sentinel-2 and 64.1% for Landsat-8 followed by dNBR (41.67% for Sentinel-2 and 47.44% for Landsat-8) and weak performance by RBR with 32.69% for Sentinel-2 and 26.92% for Landsat-8. Hence RdNBR burn severity maps are considered highly appropriate for mapping burnt areas. Even though severity analysis from both Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 is at an acceptable level, the Landsat based burn severity maps provided an adequate assessment of the degree of damage. © 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.