Faculty Publications
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://idr.nitk.ac.in/handle/123456789/18736
Publications by NITK Faculty
Browse
2 results
Search Results
Item Analytical computation of gwp, odp, rf number and tewi analysis of various r134a/r1270/r290 blends as r22 alternatives(CRC Press/Balkema, 2018) Vali, S.S.; Ashok Babu, T.P.The principal objective of the present work is to compute the GWP, ODP, RF number and TEWI analysis of various ternary R134a/R1270/R290 blends as alternatives to R22. In this study thirteen refrigerant blends consists of R134a, R1270 and R290 at different compositions are taken. GWP and ODP of refrigerant blends are computed by using various simple correlations. The estimation of emission of greenhouse gases and flammability study of refrigerants are done by using TEWI and RF analysis respectively. Analytical results revealed that all the thirteen studied fluids are ozone friendly in nature. The GWP of refrigerant M6 (651) is lower than that of GWP of R22 (1760). RF analysis exhibited that all the thirteen refrigerant blends are categorized as ASHRAE A2 flammability category. Thermodynamic analysis revealed that COP of M6 (3.608) is higher that of COP of R22 (3.534). TEWI of M6 is lower among the R22 and thirteen studied fluids. Hence refrigerant M6 (R134a/R1270/R290 50/5/45 by mass%) is an alternative to R22. © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, London.Item Theoretical Evaluation of Energy Performance of a Vapour Compression Refrigeration System Using Sustainable Refrigerants(Springer, 2020) Vali, S.V.; Ashok Babu, T.P.The chief goal of this present investigation is to evaluate performance parameters of various sustainable refrigerants as R22 alternatives. In this investigation apart from R290, R134a and R22, twelve mixture refrigerants were developed at various composition. Results showed that energy efficiency ratio (EER) of mixture refrigerant MR40 (R290/R134a 95/5 in mass%) (4.546) stood greatest among twelve investigated alternatives and it was closer to the EER of R22 (4.602). Compressor discharge temperature of MR40 was lower than R22 by 16.020C. Volumetric refrigeration capacity of MR40 (3424 kJ/m3) was relatively lesser than R22 (3801 kJ/m3). Power spent per ton of refrigeration (PPTR) of MR40 (0.773 kW/TR) stood lowest among twelve investigated alternatives and it was fairly greater than R22 (0.764 kW/TR). Global warming potential (GWP100) of MR40 (68) was very low compared to R22 (1760). Overall, performance of MR40 was closer to R22, when compared with all the twelve investigated alternatives, and hence, it might be treated as a suitable replacement to refrigerant R22. © 2020, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.